Highpeak
  • Home
  • Books and other literature
  • ABOUT US
    • CHAIRMAN
  • JOIN US
    • TIER 1 - STUDENT ENROLLMENT
    • TEIR 2 - TEMPLE STATUS
  • Res Judicata
    • TREATY SUPREMACY
    • Second Amendment
    • Community Care Taking
    • The United States is a corporation
    • Modern Day Slavery >
      • From Black Wall Street to the Ghetto
  • Moorish Treasury
  • FAQ

Organizational Loyalty

An organization is nothing without the people. The word organization, when used as a proper noun and the letter ‘O’ is capitalized, signifies “the people who constitute and run the Organization in an organized fashion”. In fact, the word corporation shares a similar meaning. The word ‘corp’ is Latin and means “body.” The suffix ‘ation’ or ‘tion’ signifies action. Thus, a corporation is a body in action. The “body” represents all the people (bodies) involved moving as one for a single purpose. Meaning not just one person is the corporation, but everyone involved. Just like a Beehive. One bee isn’t the Beehive, it’s the action and participation of all the Bees (bodies or corps) that makes it the Beehive (Body in action i.e. Corporation). Without the loyalty and involvement of each individual bee of the hive, there is no Beehive.

Organizational loyalty, or as stated in the Marine Corps Semper Fidelis (always faithful (to the Corps)) makes one show their concern for the organization and its continued success and wellbeing as there is a mutual benefit to both the Organization and the individual. Organizational commitment is the degree of loyalty to which the people identify with the organization and its goals and wish to continue with the organization. Loyalty can signify a person’s devotion or sentiment of attachment to a particular object, which may be another person or group of persons (corporation), an ideal, philosophy, duty, or a cause. It expresses itself in both thought and action and strives for the identification of the interests of the loyal person with those of the object. These reflective interests of the people combine and create the overall image or status of the organization, or as stated in the Marines esprit de corps (The Spirit of the Body). These reflective interests can display themselves in manners such as: the way the people of the organization dress, speak, conduct themselves, even down to the buildings that the company owns, what the organization does and even how they do it. Organizational loyalty is the most important factor that determines the effectiveness and efficiency of any organization. It can be described in terms of a process, where certain attitudes give rise to certain behaviors. Organizational loyalty normally has two dimensions: (i) internal, and (ii) external. Loyalty is, at its core, an emotional attachment. The internal dimension is the emotional component. It includes feelings of caring, of affiliation and of commitment. The external dimension has to do with the way loyalty manifests itself. Both are a reflection of one another, as above so below, as within, so without.

Since our inception, we have successfully gotten cases removed and dismissed from State Court, as well as filed claims in Federal Court with Moors, pursuant to our treaty, fulfilling the duties as Consul, with the recognition of the United States Federal Courts. We have also established several charitable events: providing food, clothing and other items to people in need. We have participated in the protest of DCYF for human rights violations, as well as communicated with City Council men and women asserting our status as indigenous people and having our rights recognized as a separate nation of people. We have also established our own treasury, backed by gold and silver coins.


Picture
Chairman Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey (left) and Chief Justice Frank J. Williams, Rhode Island Supreme / Superior Court (right).

Frank J. Williams (born August 24, 1940) is a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island, a notable Abraham Lincoln scholar and author, and a justice of the Military Commission Review Panel.

Picture
Rise of the Moors members and Providence City Councilwoman (Center) Carmen Castillo.

Councilwoman Carmen Castillo has been a member of the City Council since 2012. She represents the constituents of Ward 9, which includes the neighborhoods of Elmwood and South Elmwood.
Councilwoman Castillo was born in Santiago, the second-largest city in the Dominican Republic, and immigrated with her three daughters to the United States nearly 20 years ago.


Picture
Rise of the Moors and students from Johnson and Wales University charity event. (Feeding and clothing those less fortunate).

STUDY GROUP APPLICATION

Those who desire to establish a ROTM temple, are to enter a 9 (nine) month probationary study group period prior to the issuance of a charter. Study groups must first reach a minimum of 25 people prior to the issuance of a Temple charter.

An initial quiz is to be taken prior to the formation of a study group. An additional quiz or test is to be issued every 3 months. At the end of the 9-month period, the study group must average a 70% passing grade prior to receiving an official RISE OF THE MOORS TEMPLE Charter.

            When new members join the study group, that information is to be provided to the Chair and Vizier of Education, Nationalization and Citizenship. All applying and new study group members are required to provide a $50 note a month discharge; or 2.5 troy ounces of silver; or 1 gram of gold, until a charter is granted.

Each new member is to repeat the 9-month study period non-concurrently with already established members or associates.

Instructions

instructions_temple_application.pdf
File Size: 224 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Print out a blank copy of this test for each applicant. Each applicant is to complete this test. The completed test must then be submitted with the study group application along with the application fee per applicant (50 notes or 2.5 oz of .999 silver or 1.5 grams of .999 gold). It is encouraged that each applicant takes this placement test individually in order to properly assess each temple.

            Each applicant is also required to order the “Are you confused about law?” PDF Book on Riseofthemoors.org and their order number is to be placed on their test sheet. This does not apply to applicants who have already purchased the book or PDF.

The application fee and study material fee as well as all monthly dues are necessary to ensure that we can establish, in the very near future, programs to assist Moors when necessary. From arranging Moors to travel to other territories to assist with court or to get Moors out of prison, to establishing a call center where Moors can be compensated to answer calls no matter the time of day or night when Moors need assistance or consultation. All of these things and more will be impossible to accomplish if Moors are still obligated to work for Europeans and not being compensated to provide for themselves and their families by dedicating too much time and energy into these absolutely needed programs. Amongst our goals is to also shield Moors with a $1,000,000 bond so that their membership fees will be similar to an insurance policy, whereby Moors can access this money if their families or loved ones are in an emergency.
​
Prior to Temple status, all Members must recite, from memory, Caveat Emptor and the warning to all Moslems to be read in every meeting before a member of the Grand Majlis.


Picture
Picture

Home

Contact

Copyright © 2015
Disclaimer: By entering this site, you agree that you are doing so at "your own risk". You agree that RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents are not personally responsible for any inconveniences what so ever or the like. You are aware that RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents are not personally responsible for any vendors that we contract with and sell their products or merchandise on this site. You are aware and agree that all purchases and sales made are final and RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents are not personally responsible  for any refunds. All products sold are to be sought refunds by the contractor.

Submission and Determination of Disputes to Arbitration:
Every claim, dispute, controversy or difference arising out of, dealing with, relating to any sales et cetera, shall be submitted, heard and determined by arbitration and you waive your right to a class action suit against RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents. Any qualified Moorish arbitrator the parties mutually agree to with an exception to any United States / UNITED STATES agents or agencies may be selected as the arbitrator. 


RISE OF THE MOORS Copyright © Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey and the RISE OF THE MOORS NON-PROFIT CIVIC ORGANIZATION.
 
All rights reserved and retained. No part of any book or publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, mechanical or otherwise without the prior written permission of Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, his heirs, descendants or his estate.

[1] All rights reserved. The applicable law governing all contracts, books, and declarations may be, pursuant to Article PART 3. of the Uniform Commercial Codes, the Uniform Commercial Codes to include any and all applicable State, Federal and International Laws to include Treaties. § 1-202. Notice; Knowledge. § 1-206. Presumptions. § 1-305. Remedies to be Liberally Administered. § 1-307. Prima Facie Evidence by Third-Party Documents. § 7-104. Negotiable and Nonnegotiable Document of Title.
[2] COPYRIGHT. The right of literary property as recognized and sanctioned by positive law. An intangible, incorporeal right granted by statute to the author or originator of certain literary or artistic productions, whereby he is invested, for a limited period, with the sole and exclusive privilege of multiplying copies of the same and publishing and selling them. In re Rider, 16 R.I. 271, 15 A. 72; Mott Iron Works v. Clow, C.C.A.Ill., 82 F. 316, 27 C.C.A. 250; Palmer v. De Witt, 47 N.Y. 536, 7 Am.Rep. 480; Stuff v. La Budde Feed & Grain Co., D.C.Wis., 42 F.Supp. 493, 497; Schill v. Remington Putnam Book Co., 179 Md. 83, 17 A.2d 175.
[3] COMMON-LAW LIEN. One known to or granted by the common law, as distinguished from statutory, equitable, and maritime liens; also one arising by implication of law, as distinguished from one created by the agreement of the parties. The Menominie, D.C.Minn., 36 F. 197; Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Trustee, 117 Ky. 478, 78 S.W. 413, 64 L.R.A. 219. It is a right extended to a person to retain that which is in his possession belonging to another, until the demand or charge of the person in possession is paid or satisfied. Whiteside v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co., C.C.A.Colo., 101 F.2d 765, 769; Goldwater v. Mendelson, 8 N.Y.S. 627, 629, 170 Misc. 422.
[4] COMMON-LAW REMEDY. This phrase, within the meaning of U. S. Judicial Code 1911, § 256 (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1100, see Historical and Revision Notes under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1333), was not limited to remedies in the common-law courts, but embraced all methods of enforcing rights and redressing injuries known to the common or statutory law. Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co., 89 Conn. 367, 94 A. 372, 375, L.R.A. 1916A, 436. See, also, Northern Pacific S. S. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Commission of California, 174 Cal. 346, 163 P. 199, 202.
[5] COMMON-LAW TRADE-MARK. One appropriated under common-law rules, regardless of statutes. Stratton & Terstegge Co. v. Stiglitz Furnace Co., 258 Ky. 678, 81 S.W.2d 1, 3.
[6] COMMON-LAW COPYRIGHT. An intangible, incorporeal right in an author of literary or artistic productions to reproduce and sell them exclusively and arises at the moment of their creation as distinguished from federal or statutory copyrights which exist for the most part only in published works. Common law copyright is perpetual while statutory copyright is for term of years. Equitable relief is available for violation of common law copyright. Edgar H. Wood Associates Inc. v. Skene, 347 Mass. 351, 197 N.E.2d 886.
[7] 17 U.S. Code § 401. Notice of copyright: Visually perceptible copies. 17 U.S. Code CHAPTER 5— COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND REMEDIES.

For educational purposes only. The reader, possessor or owner of any book, information, documents et cetera, agrees that they will not furnish or cause to be furnished, any information obtained from RISE OF THE MOORS or Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, directly or indirectly, to any known or unknown law enforcement or police officers. And that all information acquired is in admissible in any court of the United States; and that RISE OF THE MOORS, its founder, members, affiliates, associates and officials are exempt nor to be held liable in suits related to the information from the organization, regardless of its content. No information is produced with the intent to cause or incite any action by the reader or owner of any products or items obtained from RISE OF THE MOORS, its founder, members, affiliates, associates and officials. The reader understands and comprehends that this and all other pieces of information or statements made by RISE OF THE MOORS, its founder, members, affiliates, associates and officials, is in no way intended to cause, provoke or promote the reader or listener to do, say or act in any manner.

Organizations, such as charities, seeking Federal tax exemption are required to file an application with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  Other organizations, such as social welfare organizations, may file an application but are not required to do so.  - https://www.treasury.gov/tigta/auditreports/2013reports/201310053fr.html#background

The IRS defines a social welfare organization as: [A]n organization is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare if it is primarily engaged in promoting in some way the common good and general welfare of the community.  - https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopici03.pdf

RISE OF THE MOORS is a civic organization and is therefore tax-exempt.  In Erie Endowment v. United States, 316 F.2d 151, 156 (2d Cir. 1963), the court, in defining a civic organization, summed up the matter by stating that "the organization must be a community movement designed to accomplish community ends."

While some activities promote social welfare only if the community as a whole is the recipient of services, a membership organization is not automatically precluded from exempt status. In the exceptional case, an organization whose services are made available solely to its members may qualify. In such cases, it must be clearly established that making the service available to the membership benefits the community as a whole. Social welfare organization may engage in some political activities, so long as that is not its primary activity. 

Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943).
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/319/105/

The mere fact that the religious literature is "sold", rather than "donated" does not transform the activities of the colporteur into a commercial enterprise.

A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.

A community may not suppress, or the State tax, the dissemination of views because they are unpopular, annoying, or distasteful.

But the mere fact that the religious literature is "sold" by itinerant preachers, rather than "donated," does not transform evangelism into a commercial enterprise. If it did, then the passing of the collection plate in church would make the church service a commercial project. The constitutional rights of those spreading their religious beliefs through the spoken and printed word are not to be gauged by standards governing retailers or wholesalers of books. The right to use the press for expressing one's views is not to be measured by the protection afforded commercial handbills. It should be remembered that the pamphlets of Thomas Paine were not distributed free of charge. It is plain that a religious organization needs funds to remain a going concern. But an itinerant evangelist, however misguided or intolerant he may be, does not become a mere book agent by selling the Bible or religious tracts to help defray his expenses or to sustain him. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion are available to all, not merely to those who can pay their own way. As we have said, the problem of drawing the line between a purely commercial activity and a religious one will, at times, be difficult. On this record, it plainly cannot be said that petitioners were engaged in a commercial, rather than a religious, venture. It is a distortion of the facts of record to describe their activities as the occupation of selling books and pamphlets. And the Pennsylvania court did not rest the judgments of conviction on that basis, though it did find that petitioners "sold" the literature. The Supreme Court of Iowa, in State v. Mead, 230 Iowa 1217, 300 N.W. 523, 524, described the selling activities of members of this same sect as "merely incidental and collateral" to their "main object, which was to preach and publicize the doctrines of their order." And see State v. Meredith, 197 S.C. 351, 15 S.E.2d 678; People v. Barber, 289 N.Y. 378, 385-386, 46 N.E.2d 329. That accurately summarizes the present record.

Those who can tax the exercise of this religious practice can make its exercise so costly as to deprive it of the resources necessary for its maintenance. Those who can tax the privilege of engaging in this form of missionary evangelism can close its doors to all those who do not have a full purse. Spreading religious beliefs in this ancient and honorable manner would thus be denied the needy. Those who can deprive religious groups of their colporteurs can take from them a part of the vital power of the press which has survived from the Reformation.
  • Home
  • Books and other literature
  • ABOUT US
    • CHAIRMAN
  • JOIN US
    • TIER 1 - STUDENT ENROLLMENT
    • TEIR 2 - TEMPLE STATUS
  • Res Judicata
    • TREATY SUPREMACY
    • Second Amendment
    • Community Care Taking
    • The United States is a corporation
    • Modern Day Slavery >
      • From Black Wall Street to the Ghetto
  • Moorish Treasury
  • FAQ