Highpeak
  • Home
  • Books and other literature
  • ABOUT US
    • CHAIRMAN
  • JOIN US
    • TIER 1 - STUDENT ENROLLMENT
    • TEIR 2 - TEMPLE STATUS
  • Res Judicata
    • TREATY SUPREMACY
    • Second Amendment
    • Community Care Taking
    • The United States is a corporation
    • Modern Day Slavery >
      • From Black Wall Street to the Ghetto
  • Moorish Treasury
  • FAQ
  • Literature
  • >
  • Are you Confused About Law?

Are you Confused About Law?

SKU:
$90.00
$80.00
$80.00
On Sale
Unavailable
per item

Excerpt

The General Civil Orders aforementioned gave notice to all “federal”, “state” and “municipal” employees and “elected officials” that they are employees of a private for-profit corporation, and that any acts that they take infringing on the rights and prerogatives of the American people are to be treated as criminal acts.
Therefore, all of “The United States” laws are private corporate laws to which none of those laws apply to the people. For example, if the CEO of McDonald's creates a law, that law will only apply to the employees of McDonald's. The same corporate principle applies to the corporate United States.
Through deceit, trickery and what is known as “color of law.” and police terrorism, this private corporation has been able to force these corporate laws on the people. Almost every corporation has its own security, this is where the police force comes into play. Their job is to protect and serve corporate interests and assets, not the people.
Soldiers of the Temple - Knights Templar

Omne Datum Optimum
Milites Templi
Militia Dei

The above Papal Bulls (Decrees from the Pope) is what allows the Knights (police) to reap havoc and terrorize people during the Inquisition. Knights would often take people's personal property, kill people in the streets, harass merchants, extort money from the people often guised at taxes etc. Upon seeing a group of knights walking the streets, a feeling of guilt and fear came upon the citizens, a fear of “will they stop and harass me next”, the same feeling people get today when they see police cars behind them, near them, on the side of the road, etc. Knights were allowed to rule and control areas that they had conquered from Moors, the Soldiers of the Temple are the modern-day police.

“In fact, Manozca’s true character had been apparent for forty years, ever since his appointment as one of the first inquisitors of Cartagene, Colombia, in 1609. In Cartagena Manozca and his colleague Matoe de Salcedo had made a habit of hauling market traders before them and seizing whatever took their fancy, throwing them into the inquisitorial jail if they did not comply.” - Inquisition Reign of Fear by Toby Green page 4

“…But Inquisitors were widely seen as above the law.” - Inquisition Reign of Fear by Toby Green page 5

“Directorium Inquisitorium – the 14th-century rubric for inquisitorial procedure written by Nicholas Eymerich, an inquisitor of Argon – he wrote, “We must remember that the essential aim of the trial and death sentence is not saving the soul of the defendant but furthering the public good and terrorizing the people.” The inquisition clearly believed that fear was the best way to achieve political ends.” - Inquisition Reign of Fear by Toby Green page 14

Modern police ticket you for speeding, no license, etc. although the courts have declared that police can only stop you if you've committed a crime or you are suspected of committing one etc. Yet they will steal your property if you don't have registration or a license, although the courts have already declared that they are not necessary and you cannot be arrested for not having them. They will force you off your lands, arrest you without warrant, and often kill you in cold blood in the middle of the street, just as the Knights Templar were the terrorists back in the day, what is commonly referred to as police brutality is in fact Police Terrorism, a continuation of what the Knights Templar have been doing. This is why, often times the chief of police, politicians, judges etc. are all Masons or Klansmen (KKK), they are all Knights, part of the same system that have been suppressing Moors for thousands of years.

The police are the modern-day Knights Templar, guised as men/women of law, although they violate the supreme law of the land DAILY. Knights Templars during the Inquisition and crusades often kid-napped Moors off the street and accused them of crimes they did not commit, often times torturing them until they pled guilty even though they were innocent. These tactics were also used against us here in America, so-called black men  (Moors) would be found guilty, and still to this day, for crimes we/they did not commit. One of the most popular crimes / claims made against Moors (so-called blacks) here, were to agree to the raping of a so-called white woman, this would often stir up a fiery-rage of emotions amongst the people making it easier to prosecute and often times hang an innocent man.

The Bishops or Magistrates of the realm (Governors of state or Municipal Judges) would often hold Knights (Local and State Police) not guilty for crimes perpetuated against the public, this is why police can kill people on the streets today, be found not guilty of murder and get paid time off.
Knights Templar were also prominent in ‘Christian Inquisition finance’; Christian Inquisition finance refers to banking and financial activities of the clergy, whether the finance is derived from the activities of the Knights (extortion guised as parking, speeding and other traffic tickets in modern-day), ‘Mounts of Piety’ / Banks (bank loans, investments with sever interest rates, and other banking financial moves made by rich families; the I.R.S. etc.) and the activities of the ‘Apostolic Chamber’/ Church (i.e. 501c3 and church tithing / tax.)

The word Inquisition means “to question,” “to investigate,” this is why the police, FBI, and other organizations make claims of investigation, these so-called investigations are in fact inquisition operations against our people. When they ask what corporate state are we from they are really asking who is our slave master (think 14th amendment), when they question what our name is, they are looking for a ‘Toby’ or a ‘Kunta’; in other-words, are you a Morisco or a Moor?, are you an Indian or Black – meaning, have you sold your birth right? or do you stand on your square and honor you mother and fathers nationality?, based upon your answer (competence) these questions help them establish a quasi-jurisdiction over you, for them to encroach and molest your birth rights.

"Nowhere in the document [constitution] for instance, is there specific authorization for congress to found anything like the Federal Reserve System or even a bank to enable it to discharge its fiscal responsibilities, create a national police force like [but not limited to] the Federal Bureau of Investigation..." – American Constitutional Interpretation 2nd edition by: Walter F. Murry, James E. Fleming and Sotirios A. Barber page 11

They work together [Police, Tow companies, Judges, Governors, Insurance companies, Banks, Trust companies etc.]. To keep thinking they will persecute their friends is to keep suffering from the continued Inquisition and Crusades that have not ended, but merely changed names, clothing and a slight change in language.

To keep the lower level police and troopers in check, they keep this knowledge on a ‘Need to know basis,’ similar to the military secrete clearance structure, where all the higher-ups know that the police are in fact the military arm and enforcers of corporate law to benefit the rich and rob the poor or lower class working citizens (Knights-Templars), because if this knowledge was commonly known, the morality and good in people would fix the issue, as people would stop joining the police force in hopes to provide security for the people, when in fact the police do the exact opposite. If the truth was given to people bluntly, many people would not be in the compromising positions they are in today and these organized oppressive systems would collapse in an instant.

In the, SAPP vs. Tallahassee case, it is clear that the duty of the of the police is to protect corporate assets, enforce corporate law and arrest those who break them; “Code breakers”. In the case Ms. Sapp was attempting to hold the Tallahassee police responsible for not assisting her, upon them witnessing two men entering a hotel shortly after her and running out of the hotel moments later; after robbing and beating her, logically she sought remedy.
​
The court decided that since the police had no special duty nor contractual obligation to her, they then were not liable. Which would be a conflict of law considering they (the police) make claim to be “Law Enforcement Officers”, in the law enforcement code of ethics - oath; in the first paragraph, it reads:

“As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice.”

books are expected to be here in January 2023 so expect to have them no later than the month of Feburary.

5 available
Add to Cart

Home

Contact

Copyright © 2015
Disclaimer: By entering this site, you agree that you are doing so at "your own risk". You agree that RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents are not personally responsible for any inconveniences what so ever or the like. You are aware that RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents are not personally responsible for any vendors that we contract with and sell their products or merchandise on this site. You are aware and agree that all purchases and sales made are final and RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents are not personally responsible  for any refunds. All products sold are to be sought refunds by the contractor.

Submission and Determination of Disputes to Arbitration:
Every claim, dispute, controversy or difference arising out of, dealing with, relating to any sales et cetera, shall be submitted, heard and determined by arbitration and you waive your right to a class action suit against RISE OF THE MOORS and its principal agents. Any qualified Moorish arbitrator the parties mutually agree to with an exception to any United States / UNITED STATES agents or agencies may be selected as the arbitrator. 


RISE OF THE MOORS Copyright © Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey and the RISE OF THE MOORS NON-PROFIT CIVIC ORGANIZATION.
 
All rights reserved and retained. No part of any book or publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, mechanical or otherwise without the prior written permission of Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, his heirs, descendants or his estate.

[1] All rights reserved. The applicable law governing all contracts, books, and declarations may be, pursuant to Article PART 3. of the Uniform Commercial Codes, the Uniform Commercial Codes to include any and all applicable State, Federal and International Laws to include Treaties. § 1-202. Notice; Knowledge. § 1-206. Presumptions. § 1-305. Remedies to be Liberally Administered. § 1-307. Prima Facie Evidence by Third-Party Documents. § 7-104. Negotiable and Nonnegotiable Document of Title.
[2] COPYRIGHT. The right of literary property as recognized and sanctioned by positive law. An intangible, incorporeal right granted by statute to the author or originator of certain literary or artistic productions, whereby he is invested, for a limited period, with the sole and exclusive privilege of multiplying copies of the same and publishing and selling them. In re Rider, 16 R.I. 271, 15 A. 72; Mott Iron Works v. Clow, C.C.A.Ill., 82 F. 316, 27 C.C.A. 250; Palmer v. De Witt, 47 N.Y. 536, 7 Am.Rep. 480; Stuff v. La Budde Feed & Grain Co., D.C.Wis., 42 F.Supp. 493, 497; Schill v. Remington Putnam Book Co., 179 Md. 83, 17 A.2d 175.
[3] COMMON-LAW LIEN. One known to or granted by the common law, as distinguished from statutory, equitable, and maritime liens; also one arising by implication of law, as distinguished from one created by the agreement of the parties. The Menominie, D.C.Minn., 36 F. 197; Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Trustee, 117 Ky. 478, 78 S.W. 413, 64 L.R.A. 219. It is a right extended to a person to retain that which is in his possession belonging to another, until the demand or charge of the person in possession is paid or satisfied. Whiteside v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co., C.C.A.Colo., 101 F.2d 765, 769; Goldwater v. Mendelson, 8 N.Y.S. 627, 629, 170 Misc. 422.
[4] COMMON-LAW REMEDY. This phrase, within the meaning of U. S. Judicial Code 1911, § 256 (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1100, see Historical and Revision Notes under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1333), was not limited to remedies in the common-law courts, but embraced all methods of enforcing rights and redressing injuries known to the common or statutory law. Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co., 89 Conn. 367, 94 A. 372, 375, L.R.A. 1916A, 436. See, also, Northern Pacific S. S. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Commission of California, 174 Cal. 346, 163 P. 199, 202.
[5] COMMON-LAW TRADE-MARK. One appropriated under common-law rules, regardless of statutes. Stratton & Terstegge Co. v. Stiglitz Furnace Co., 258 Ky. 678, 81 S.W.2d 1, 3.
[6] COMMON-LAW COPYRIGHT. An intangible, incorporeal right in an author of literary or artistic productions to reproduce and sell them exclusively and arises at the moment of their creation as distinguished from federal or statutory copyrights which exist for the most part only in published works. Common law copyright is perpetual while statutory copyright is for term of years. Equitable relief is available for violation of common law copyright. Edgar H. Wood Associates Inc. v. Skene, 347 Mass. 351, 197 N.E.2d 886.
[7] 17 U.S. Code § 401. Notice of copyright: Visually perceptible copies. 17 U.S. Code CHAPTER 5— COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND REMEDIES.

For educational purposes only. The reader, possessor or owner of any book, information, documents et cetera, agrees that they will not furnish or cause to be furnished, any information obtained from RISE OF THE MOORS or Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, directly or indirectly, to any known or unknown law enforcement or police officers. And that all information acquired is in admissible in any court of the United States; and that RISE OF THE MOORS, its founder, members, affiliates, associates and officials are exempt nor to be held liable in suits related to the information from the organization, regardless of its content. No information is produced with the intent to cause or incite any action by the reader or owner of any products or items obtained from RISE OF THE MOORS, its founder, members, affiliates, associates and officials. The reader understands and comprehends that this and all other pieces of information or statements made by RISE OF THE MOORS, its founder, members, affiliates, associates and officials, is in no way intended to cause, provoke or promote the reader or listener to do, say or act in any manner.

Organizations, such as charities, seeking Federal tax exemption are required to file an application with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  Other organizations, such as social welfare organizations, may file an application but are not required to do so.  - https://www.treasury.gov/tigta/auditreports/2013reports/201310053fr.html#background

The IRS defines a social welfare organization as: [A]n organization is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare if it is primarily engaged in promoting in some way the common good and general welfare of the community.  - https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopici03.pdf

RISE OF THE MOORS is a civic organization and is therefore tax-exempt.  In Erie Endowment v. United States, 316 F.2d 151, 156 (2d Cir. 1963), the court, in defining a civic organization, summed up the matter by stating that "the organization must be a community movement designed to accomplish community ends."

While some activities promote social welfare only if the community as a whole is the recipient of services, a membership organization is not automatically precluded from exempt status. In the exceptional case, an organization whose services are made available solely to its members may qualify. In such cases, it must be clearly established that making the service available to the membership benefits the community as a whole. Social welfare organization may engage in some political activities, so long as that is not its primary activity. 

Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943).
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/319/105/

The mere fact that the religious literature is "sold", rather than "donated" does not transform the activities of the colporteur into a commercial enterprise.

A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.

A community may not suppress, or the State tax, the dissemination of views because they are unpopular, annoying, or distasteful.

But the mere fact that the religious literature is "sold" by itinerant preachers, rather than "donated," does not transform evangelism into a commercial enterprise. If it did, then the passing of the collection plate in church would make the church service a commercial project. The constitutional rights of those spreading their religious beliefs through the spoken and printed word are not to be gauged by standards governing retailers or wholesalers of books. The right to use the press for expressing one's views is not to be measured by the protection afforded commercial handbills. It should be remembered that the pamphlets of Thomas Paine were not distributed free of charge. It is plain that a religious organization needs funds to remain a going concern. But an itinerant evangelist, however misguided or intolerant he may be, does not become a mere book agent by selling the Bible or religious tracts to help defray his expenses or to sustain him. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion are available to all, not merely to those who can pay their own way. As we have said, the problem of drawing the line between a purely commercial activity and a religious one will, at times, be difficult. On this record, it plainly cannot be said that petitioners were engaged in a commercial, rather than a religious, venture. It is a distortion of the facts of record to describe their activities as the occupation of selling books and pamphlets. And the Pennsylvania court did not rest the judgments of conviction on that basis, though it did find that petitioners "sold" the literature. The Supreme Court of Iowa, in State v. Mead, 230 Iowa 1217, 300 N.W. 523, 524, described the selling activities of members of this same sect as "merely incidental and collateral" to their "main object, which was to preach and publicize the doctrines of their order." And see State v. Meredith, 197 S.C. 351, 15 S.E.2d 678; People v. Barber, 289 N.Y. 378, 385-386, 46 N.E.2d 329. That accurately summarizes the present record.

Those who can tax the exercise of this religious practice can make its exercise so costly as to deprive it of the resources necessary for its maintenance. Those who can tax the privilege of engaging in this form of missionary evangelism can close its doors to all those who do not have a full purse. Spreading religious beliefs in this ancient and honorable manner would thus be denied the needy. Those who can deprive religious groups of their colporteurs can take from them a part of the vital power of the press which has survived from the Reformation.
  • Home
  • Books and other literature
  • ABOUT US
    • CHAIRMAN
  • JOIN US
    • TIER 1 - STUDENT ENROLLMENT
    • TEIR 2 - TEMPLE STATUS
  • Res Judicata
    • TREATY SUPREMACY
    • Second Amendment
    • Community Care Taking
    • The United States is a corporation
    • Modern Day Slavery >
      • From Black Wall Street to the Ghetto
  • Moorish Treasury
  • FAQ